October 8, 2008

On Being a Muslim Woman

I was surprised to come across this article in the Washington Post this Sunday.  We need more articles like this to make people understand that Muslim women are not oppressed and miserable, which is what the media would like everyone to believe.

Enjoy!

Spare Me the Sermon On Muslim Women

By Mohja Kahf

Sunday, October 5, 2008; Page B01

Crimson chiffon, silver lamé or green silk: Which scarf to wear today? My veil collection is 64 scarves and growing. The scarves hang four or five to a row on a rack in my closet, and elation fills me when I open the door to this beautiful array. Last week, I chose a particularly nice scarf to slip on for the Eid al-Fitr festivities marking the end of the month of Ramadan.

It irks me that I even have to say this: Being a Muslim woman is a joyful thing.

My first neighbor in Arkansas borrowed my Quran and returned it, saying, “I’m glad I’m not a Muslim woman.” Excuse me, but a woman with Saint Paul in her religious heritage has no place feeling superior to a Muslim woman, as far as woman-affirming principles are concerned. Maybe no worse, if I listen to Christian feminists, but certainly no better.

Blessings abound for me as a Muslim woman: The freshness of ablution is mine, and the daily meditation zone of five prayers that involve graceful, yoga-like movements, performed in prayer attire. Prayer scarves are a chapter in themselves, cool and comforting as bedsheets. They lie folded in the velveteen prayer rug when not in use: two lightweight muslin pieces, the long drapey headcover and the roomy gathered skirt. I fling open the top piece, and it billows like summer laundry, a lace-edged meadow. I slip into the bottom piece to cover my legs for prayer time because I am wearing shorts around the house today.

These create a tent of tranquility. The serene spirit sent from God is called by a feminine name, “sakinah,” in the Quran, and I understand why some Muslim women like to wear their prayer clothes for more than prayer, to take that sakinah into the world with them. I, too, wear a (smaller) version of the veil when I go out. What a loss it would be for me not to have in my life this alternating structure, of covering outdoors and uncovering indoors. I take pleasure in preparing a clean, folded set for a houseguest, the way home-decor mavens lay elegant plump towels around a bathroom to give it a relaxing feel.

Tassled turquoise cotton and flowered peach crepe flutter as I pull out a black-and-ivory striped headscarf for the day. When I was 22 and balked at buying a $30 paisley scarf, my best friend told me, “I never scrimp on scarves. If people are going to make a big deal of it, it may as well look good.”

I embraced that principle, too, even when I was a scratch-poor graduate student. Today I sort my scarves, always looking to replace the frayed ones and to find missing colors, my collection shrinking and expanding, dynamic, bright: The blue-and-yellow daisy print is good with jeans, the incandescent purple voile for a night on the town, the gray houndstooth solidly professional, the white chambray anytime.

As beautiful as veils are, they are not the best part of being a Muslim woman — and many Muslim women in Islamic countries don’t veil. The central blessing of Islam to women is that it affirms their spiritual equality with men, a principle stated over and over in the Quran, on a plane believers hold to be untouched by the social or legalistic “women in Islam” concerns raised by other parts of the Scripture, in verses parsed endlessly by patriarchal interpreters as well as Muslim feminists and used by Islamophobes to “prove” Islam’s sexism. This is how most believing Muslim women experience God: as the Friend who is beyond gender, not as the Father, not as the Son, not inhabiting a male form, or any form.

And the reasons for being a joyful Muslim woman go beyond the spiritual. Marriage is a contract in Islam, not a sacrament. The prenup is not some new invention; it’s the standard Muslim format. I can put whatever I want in it, but Muslims never get credit for that. Or for having mahr, the bridegift that goes from the man to the woman — not to her family, but to her, for her own private use. A mahr has to have significant value — a year’s salary, say. And if patriarchal customs have overridden Islam and whittled away this blessing in many Muslim locales, it’s still there, available, in the law. Hey, I got mine (cash, partly deferred because my husband was broke when we married; like a loan to him, owed to me whenever I want to claim it) — and I was married in Saudi Arabia, a country whose personal-status laws are drawn from the most conservative end of the Muslim spectrum.

I had to sign my name indicating my consent, or the marriage contract would not have been valid under Saudi Islamic law. And, of course, I chose whom to marry. Every Muslim girl in the conservative circle of my youth chose her husband. We just did it our way, a conservative Muslim way, and we did it without this nonsensical Western custom of teenage dating. My friends Salma and Magda chose at 16 and 17: Salma to marry boy-next-door Muhammad, with whom she grew up, and Magda to marry a doctor 10 years her senior who came courting from half a world away. Both sisters have careers, one as a counselor, one as a school principal, and both are still vibrantly married and vibrantly Muslim, their kids now in college.

I held out until I was 18, making my parents beat back suitors at the door until I was good and ready. And here I am, still married to the guy I finally let in the door, 22 years (some of them not even dysfunctional) later. My cousin, on the other hand, broke off a marriage she contracted (but did not consummate) at 16 and chose another man. Another childhood friend, Zeynab, chose four times and is looking for Mr. Fifth. Her serial monogamy is nothing new or radical; she didn’t pick up the idea from reading Cosmo or from the “liberating” influence of U.S. troops in Afghanistan. It’s simply what a lot of women in early Muslim history did, in 7th- and 8th-century Arabia.

And would you guess that we’ve also been freer to divorce and remarry than Christian women have been for most of history? In medieval times, when Christian authorities were against divorce and remarriage, this was seen as another Islamic abomination. Now that divorce and remarriage are popular in the West, Muslims don’t get credit for having had that flexibility all along. We just can’t win with the Muslim-haters.

Here’s another one: Medieval Christianity excoriated Islam for being orgiastic, which seems to mean that Muslims didn’t lay a guilt trip on hot sex (at least within what were deemed licit relationships). Now that hot sex is all the rage in the post-sexual revolution West, you’d think Muslims would get some credit for the pro-sex attitude of Islam — but no. The older stereotype has been turned on its head, and in the new one, we’re the prudes. Listen, we’re the only monotheistic faith I know with an actual legal rule that the wife has a right to orgasm.

Of course, I’m still putting in my time struggling for a more woman-affirming interpretation of Islam and in criticizing Muslim misogyny (which at times is almost as bad as American misogyny), but let me take a moment to celebrate some of the good stuff. Under Islamic law, custody of minor children always goes first to the mother. The Quran doesn’t blame Eve. Literacy for women is highly encouraged by the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad. Breast-feeding is a woman’s choice and a means for her to create family ties independent of male lineage, as nursing creates legally recognized family relationships under Islamic law. Rapists are punishable by death in Islamic law (and yes, an atavistic part of me applauds that death penalty), which they certainly are not in any Western legal code. Birth control allowed in Islamic law? Check. Masturbation? Let’s just say former surgeon general Joycelyn Elders’s permissive stance on that practice is not unknown among classical and modern Muslim jurists. Abortion? Again, allowances exist — even Muslims seem not to remember that.

It’s easy to forget that Muslims are not inherently more sexist than folks in other religions. Muslim societies may lag behind on some issues that women in certain economically advanced, non-Muslim societies have resolved after much effort, but on other issues, Muslim women’s options run about the same as those of women all over the world. And in some areas of life, Muslim women are better equipped by their faith tradition for autonomy and dignity.

There are “givens” that I take for granted as a Muslim woman that women of other faiths had to struggle to gain. For example, it took European and American women centuries to catch up to Islamic law on a woman’s fully equal right to own property. And it’s not an airy abstraction; it’s a right Muslim women have practiced, even in Saudi Arabia, where women own businesses, donate land for schools and endow trusts, just as they did in 14th-century Egypt, 9th-century Iraq and anywhere else Islamic law has been in effect.

Khadija was the boss of her husband, our beloved Prophet Muhammad, hiring him during her fourth widowhood to run caravans for her successful business; he caught her eye, and she proposed marriage to him. Fatima is the revered mother figure of Shiite Islam, our lady of compassion, possessed of a rich emotional trove for us. Her daughter Zainab is the classic figure of high moral protest, the Muslim Antigone, shaking her fist at the corrupt caliph who killed her brother, her tomb a shrine of comfort for millions of the pious. Saints, queens, poets, scribes and scholars adorn the history of Muslim womanhood.

In modern times, Muslim women have been heads of state five times in Muslim-majority countries, elected democratically by popular vote (in Bangladesh twice and also in Turkey, Indonesia and Pakistan). And I’m not saying that a woman president is necessarily a women’s president, but how many times has a woman been president of the United States?

Yet even all that gorgeous history pales when I open my closet door for the evening’s pick: teal georgette, pink-and-beige plaid, creamy fringed wool or ice-blue organza? God, why would anyone assume I would want to give up such beauty? I love being a Muslim woman. And I’m always looking for my next great polka-dot scarf.

Mohja Kahf is the author of the novel “The Girl in the Tangerine Scarf.”

September 27, 2008

Mercy Like the Rain…

Allah possesses 100 mercies, only one of which He has sent down to the world, through which His creatures are merciful to each other. And 99 mercies has He held back, and with them He shall have mercy on people on the Day of Judgment. (Bukhari)

Every time I read this hadith, I just get really emotional because it’s hard to imagine that much mercy. Honestly, if you reflect on it, really take a good look around you (in nature) you really see so much mercy…rahmah.  If you think about it, Allah (subhan wa ta’ala) could have made the earth a harsh and unrelenting place for us…if it never rained, or if we didn’t have any trees for shade, or flowers for beauty, or fertile land for growing food, just imagine how difficult it would have been to live here.

If you have ever seen the way animals take care of their young, you know what mercy is. I remember a few years ago, the panda at the National Zoo in D.C. gave birth and they installed a camera in it’s enclosure so people could watch the pandas from home (and of course, instead of studying, I spent my time watching the pandas :-D ). I was just amazed by how that mother panda took care of her baby…she was so gentle and loving towards her baby…I don’t really have words to describe it. She would cradle her baby in her arms like we do, she would play with it, she would feed it, everything. It was just AMAZING.

I can’t imagine that the love and mercy we have between us is just ONE part of the mercy that is there. It makes me emotional because when we sin, we feel like we’re just so bad and there’s no hope for us, but we have to remember that Allah (subhan wa ta’ala) is the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful. We say Bismillah Ar Rahman Ar Raheem how many times a day, and yet we forget the meaning of His most beautiful names.

Tonight is the 27th night of Ramadan and MAYBE Laylatul Qadr…ask for forgiveness, thank Allah (subhan wa ta’ala) for everything He’s given us, and make dua for our Ummah.

Never ever let Shaytan make you feel like you can’t ask for forgiveness for your sins or that you’re too unworthy to pray (it happens to all of us, trust me). It’s just not true.

BTW this is the nasheed that I got the title of my post from :)

September 16, 2008

Pakistan is Next

Is it just me, or is the Bush war machine now marching quickly towards Pakistan?  From Bush secretly approving U.S. raids into Pakistan (without the permission of Pakistan’s government, and while criticizing Russia’s invasion of Georgia…but that’s not hypocrisy or anything) to the recent killings of 23 civilians in Northern Pakistan, this “War on Terror” just keeps getting better and better.  So far, the Bush administration has bombed and killed civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan (this is apart from being silent during the Israeli bombings of Lebanon, Syria, and of course the Palestinian territories). I guess this is all just collateral damage…after all, they’re not civilized like people in the West, who value their families and their freedom. We’re doing them a favor by killing them like cockroaches. Right.

The argument I hear most to justify the invasion of Pakistan is the fact that Pakistan is a nuclear power and is considered “unstable”…meaning some crazies might try to get their hands on the nukes.  However, I have never, ever heard one Pakistani say that they wanted to use the nukes or bomb anyone…not India, or Israel, or the U.S. I can’t count how many times I’ve heard people here (in the U.S.) say things like “Let’s bomb Mecca” (said by U.S. Congressman Tom Tancredo)  “Let’s nuke those bastards off the map” and “Let’s bomb them back to the Stone Age.” Hmm…

It’s sad to sit and watch the invasion of one’s motherland being debated and supported. Pakistan is a sovereign country, so it would be nice if it was treated like one, but I guess it would be hard for the Bush administration to start adhering to international law all of a sudden. Americans want to see democracy in the Middle East, but the fact that Bush ordered the secret raids while the Pakistani government was in transition seems to be telling the Pakistani public something else.  How can America “encourage” democracy while undermining it at the same time? I don’t get it. I did come across this article on CounterPunch that tries to explain it though…

An excerpt from CounterPunch.com:

“A pattern is beginning to emerge.  Every time the Pakistani military and local tribal forces in Pakistan’s north form a successful alliance in the fight against terrorism, US forces launch offensives striking civilians in the area, thereby undermining the Pakistan military’s credibility vis a vis its own population and sabotaging the effectiveness of the joint strategy to combat terrorism in the region.

As a result, anti-Americanism in Pakistan has reached record highs and even those Pakistanis who are left-leaning and actively lobbying for an end to the brutality of terrorism are concluding that America’s primary interest lies in destabilizing Pakistan and not in putting an end to terrorism.  This should be worrying for a nation that has few friends left in the Muslim world and needs Pakistan’s cooperation desperately if it is to maintain its supply routes in Afghanistan…

America has some desperate soul-searching to do.  There is a pretty good reason why anti-Americanism has grown in leaps and bounds in the Bush years.  It will take a lot to undo it.  The American media is not doing its people any favours by not showing the effects of American raids on civilians in Afghanistan and Pakistan.  Having lived in America for a few years myself, I do believe that if Americans were better informed, they would not let their government make the mistakes it makes and trample on the lives of people abroad in the manner that it does.  America must ask itself:  is it possible after all to mess up so much, destroy so many lives, and not expect pay back?”

September 12, 2008

The Gray Lady of Bagram- Dr. Aafia Siddiqui

The mysterious story of Aafia Siddiqui is one I’ve been following for a few months and one that has disturbed and disgusted me from the minute I became aware of it.  It is the story of a US-educated Pakistani woman who “disappeared” with her 3 children in 2003 and resurfaced in 2008, only after questions were being raised about Prisoner 650, the “Gray Lady of Bagram,” whose screams are said to have seriously disturbed the other prisoners at the US airbase in Afghanistan, Bagram (which is famous for it’s use of torture).

I can’t believe the crap they’re trying to feed us about this woman. Apparently, they (”they” being the government) want us to believe that after being totally absent for 5 years, she miraculously resurfaced in Afghanistan with the intent to commit terrorist activities against the US and Afghanistan.  Umm..okk….so if she was a high-level operative in Al-Qaeda/the Taliban, why did she wait 5 years to attack? Wouldn’t that be, like, at the top of her to-do list?

This is what an M4 looks like

This is what an M4 looks like

She is also accused of attacking and trying to kill US military officials (among them were a few FBI agents) by grabbing an M4 left on the floor by one of the soldiers and shooting at them.  Apparently, the weak and tiny woman (who reportedly weighs only 90-something lbs.) found enough strength in her to attack 6 military guys (none of whom were injured, even though the M4 “can fire at a rate of 700 to 950 bullets a minute” according to this article on MSNBC) and ended up getting shot at least once. I don’t know how they seriously expect us to believe this BS…

Her 12 year old son (an American citizen) is also apparently a threat to US security and is being detained in Afghanistan. The other kids (now 5 and 10 years of age) are nowhere to be found…

This woman has reportedly been raped, tortured, abused (broken nose, missing teeth, missing a kidney and a part of her intestines) and separated from her children.  She was handed over (read: sold to the US by Pakistani intelligence through the “Find a ‘Terrorist’, Win $25,000″ program, sponsored by your tax dollars! Only Muslims need apply…) by her own countrymen to be treated worse than an animal for no apparent reason…no official terrorism charges have been brought against her. Even the FBI website claims they only want to “talk” to her.

This Muslim woman (who wears hijab) is subjected to humiliating strip-searches and cavity searches whenever she sees her lawyers or goes to court.

This really is a shameful story for Americans, Pakistanis, Muslims, humans in general. After reading and hearing the things this poor woman has been through, I really am ashamed to be called some of the above. These are the kind of injustices our governments are committing in our name…and we’re letting them…

Just think about it…it doesn’t matter if you’re Christian, Muslim, Jew, Black, White, Asian whatever…Would you want your daughter/mother/sister/wife to be in Dr. Aafia’s shoes?

Up until now I used to think the “War on Terror” was targeting Muslim men–old and young, American and foreign. I guess they finally decided Muslim women and children are dangerous too.

May Allah (subhan wa ta’ala) ease this sister’s suffering, ease her pain, and bring her to justice soon. Ameen.

Everyone is innocent until proven guilty.

For more info:

“The Aafia Siddiqui I Saw” A first-hand account of one of her court hearings

http://muslimmatters.org/2008/08/18/the-grey-lady-of-bagram-dr-aafia-siddiqui/

The Pakistan Policy Blog

NPR’s report

The official DOJ Press Release about Dr. Aafia’s arrest (which is quite creative, I might add…if you’re a trained military officer, why on Earth would you leave your weapon on the floor when you’re going to pick up a suspected terrorist? )

http://www.counterpunch.org/mariner09102008.html

Wikipedia (has lots of articles in the references section)

UPDATE: (9/16/08):

According to the Associated Press, Dr. Aafia’s son was released to his aunt in Pakistan.  The other 2 children are still missing.  Here are the details

September 10, 2008

“Giuliani and Muslims” A Letter to the Editor

It bugs me that people, especially our wonderfully enlightened politicians, lump all Muslims into one big category labeled “terrorists” based on the actions of a few crazies, and yet continue to ask the question “Why do they hate us?”  On the one hand, you’re asking the “moderate” Muslims for support in the “War on Terror” all while sticking them in the same category as those terrorists you’re fighting against. Great idea guys!

An excerpt of the letter, written by Saqib Ali, a member of the Maryland House of Delegates, from the New York Times:

As a Muslim-American elected official, I am appalled that Rudolph W. Giuliani chose to equate all terrorists with members of the Islamic faith during his G.O.P. convention address.

He said: “For four days in Denver, the Democrats were afraid to use the term ‘Islamic terrorism.’ ” I imagine they believe it is politically incorrect to say it. I think they believe they will insult someone. Please tell me, who they are insulting if they say, ‘Islamic terrorism.’ They are insulting terrorists!”

Sorry, Rudy. That statement doesn’t insult terrorists; it insults all hard-working, loyal Muslim-Americans. Worse still, none of the convention pundits or commentators for any major paper or network called him on it.

Several Democratic speakers, including Barack Obama, did address the serious issue of the fight against terrorism, but they did it in a way that did not imply that all Muslim people are terrorists. Mr. Giuliani doesn’t seem to know better.

Of course Mr. Giuliani doesn’t seem to know any better. Look at the party he’s from (Republican, for those who don’t know). If they knew better, would this country be in this shape at this time?

September 9, 2008

Out with the old…

So I’ve decided to change the design of my blog since I’ve had it for soooo long and it’s a little confusing. You’ll probably see this page change a bunch of times so don’t think I’ve finally lost it or anything.  I’m just trying to design something I like.  Let me know what you think :)

September 7, 2008

A Sad, Sad Day for Pakistan…

The day has finally arrived when a well-known thug and thief is “elected” to rule Pakistan. Only God can save that country…

From MSNBC (bold by me, to emphasize the absurdity of the situation):

“Widely known as “Mr. 10 percent” for alleged skimming of government contracts, Zardari at one time faced charges in Pakistan, the U.K. and Switzerland. He maintains the charges were all politically motivated and never proven.

All charges against Zardari and Bhutto were dropped last year as part of a U.S.-brokered deal with President Musharraf, which paved the way for Benazir Bhutto to return to Pakistan from self-imposed exile. That amnesty, known as the National Reconciliation Ordinance, is controversial and unpopular in Pakistan and allegedly the reason Zardari has gone back on his promise to restore the independent-minded judges. The restoration of the deposed chief justice would likely see the case against Zardari brought up again and the amnesty thrown out.

Zardari refuses to answer questions from political opponents who wonder how he acquired his vast fortunes given that he does not come from great wealth. Last week, London’s Financial Times newspaper reported that Zardari had presented medical certificates to the English High Court as recently as last year stating he was suffering from severe psychiatric problems, including dementia. It is widely held that these medical statements were falsified to postpone Zardari’s cases before the courts. If this were to be true, then he would have committed perjury.

“We cannot trust a President who is a liar and who does not honor his promises. Before he was Mr. 10 percent. Now he will become Mr. 100 percent and, who knows, next he may sell the country,” said Muhammed Iqbal Tanoli, an Islamabad lawyer who took part yesterday in a sit-in by the country’s lawyers in front of the parliament demanding Zardari restore the judiciary.”

http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1354789

September 5, 2008

Five Things I’m Grateful For

Ramadan is supposed to be a time for spiritual renewal and part of this renewal is to reflect and be grateful for all the things we’ve been blessed with.  Sometimes it seems like nothing is going right and it’s never going to get better…lately I’ve been feeling that way (A LOT…for various reasons), so I’m just realllllyyy happy Ramadan is here. I hope I’ll be able to refresh my mind and look on the brighter side of things, inshAllah. There are people out there who are suffering wayyyy worse than I am and who don’t have all of the things I’m blessed with. I really should be grateful and remember that Allah (subhan wa ta’ala) only tests those that he loves and that with every hardship comes ease.

It’s helpful to remember things we should be grateful for in our times of hardship, so here’s my short list of things I’m especially grateful for:

1.)  My religion: I truly feel blessed to be a Muslim. I hope and pray that Allah (subhan wa ta’ala) will keep me Muslim til my last breath and raise me with the Mu’minoon on the Day of Judgement (ameen).

2.) My family: My family is my rock. They keep me straight and give me support when I need it. I couldn’t have asked for better parents…they raised me and my brother and sisters the best they could and went above and beyond for us in every way.  It’s funny because I used to think everyone’s family was like mine and everyone’s parents were like mine, but I found out soon enough that’s not true.  My family became known as “The Brady Bunch” because my parents actually got along, my siblings and I treated each other with respect and talked nicely with each other lol…it used to bother me at the time (imagine that), but as I matured, I really appreciated the fact that my family is not dysfunctional or crazy in any way, alhumdulillah :)

3.) My health: Alhumdulillah, alhumdulillah, alhumdulillah Allah has blessed me with good health, and for that I am extremely grateful. Now if only I can lose some weight… :)

4.) My community: I can honestly say I have never seen a Muslim community like my community anywhere.  The people here are extremely understanding and friendly. There isn’t any “masjid drama.” We don’t have extreme masjid politics. We don’t have the Arabs vs. Desis dilemma. I’ve been places where when I said “salam” to someone they looked at me like I just cursed them and scuttled away, harassed. I’ve been places where people will say salams to you and hug you, then whisper loudly about you…while you’re still there.  I’m sure there are a few people like that in my community as well…it’s not perfect in any way, but the good things about this community greatly outweigh the bad, and I know it could definitely be a lot worse.

5.) My future: Even though I’m constantly obsessing about my future (who isn’t?), I realize that it’s not really in my control, it’s in Allah’s control. It’s hard not to freak out, especially in bad times, but we need to remember who is really in charge. We can worry and cry all we want, it won’t change a thing (easy to say, hard to remember). Making dua to Allah to guide you towards or away from something (which only He knows is good or bad for you) is the best way to go. Otherwise our lives will be full of anxiety over what will happen next.  I will try to remember this next time I’m freaking out about something, inshAllah.

September 3, 2008

Ramadan Mubarak!!!!!!!!

I can’t believe a year has come and gone and Ramadan is here again!  I hope this Ramadan brings lots of blessings to all of us and allows us to become stronger in our Iman.  Ameen! Please keep me in your duas (I need them!).

I found this beeaaauuutiful recitation of Surah Rahman (one of my favorites!!!) recited by Qari Sadaqat Ali.  Enjoy!

August 26, 2008

Hindu “Hardliners” (AKA Terrorists)

So, I was browsing around and I came across this sad story about a bunch of crazy Hindu fundamentalists who burnt down an orphanage (honestly…who burns down an orphanage???). The part that I found ironic (not sure if that’s even the right word for it) was how the Hindus who attacked the orphanage were referred to as “hardliners” throughout the article even though their actions can definitely be called terrorism…soooo why not just call them terrorists? If this was a Muslim group….well we all know what kind of words would have been used to describe those crazy-backward-fundamentalist-terrorists…right?

Sigh.

Suspected Hindu hard-liners set fire to orphanage

Mon Aug 25, 2:41 PM ET

Suspected Hindu hard-liners set fire Monday to an orphanage run by Christian missionaries in eastern India, killing one woman and seriously injuring a priest, police said.

Ashok Biswal, superintendent of police, said the woman was a 21-year-old teacher giving computer training to children at the orphanage. Initial reports that the woman was a nun were incorrect, he said

The attack occurred in Khuntapali, a village in Orissa state, during a strike called by the World Hindu Council to protest the killing Saturday of a Hindu religious leader and four others by suspected communist rebels in another district of the state, Biswal told The Associated Press.

Biswal said on Monday a group of Hindu hard-liners converged on the orphanage in Khuntapali, nearly 250 miles west of the state capital of Bhubaneshwar, and asked nearly 20 residents to leave the complex.

They then set the orphanage on fire with the woman and priest locked inside, he said.

The woman died and the priest was hospitalized with serious burns, Biswal said. He added that doctors now said the priest was “out of danger.”

In 1999, an Australian missionary, Graham Staines, and his two sons were killed by a Hindu mob that set their car on fire.

The region is marked by religious tensions between Christian missionaries who work with mostly poor tribes in the region and hard-line Hindu groups that claim the Christians are forcing or bribing people to convert.

Churches deny that residents have been pressured or bribed to change their religious beliefs.

Indian law accepts missionaries but bars forced conversions. Nevertheless, any missionary activity generally provokes controversy.

Hindus account for 84 percent of India’s more than 1.1 billion population and Christians about 2.4 percent.